
Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI) commitments arise when someone is charged with a crime, found not guilty by reason of insanity, and then committed through a civil process. These cases often involve expert psychiatric opinions, forensic risk assessments, and complex litigation.
A common misconception is that an NGRI verdict is a loophole or an “easy way out.” In practice, it is difficult to establish for several reasons:
For these reasons, courts and practitioners do not view NGRI as a technicality, and NGRI findings are relatively rare.
Historically, another barrier existed: even when an expert supported the defense, some lawyers avoided pursuing an NGRI finding because it was difficult to predict how long a client might remain civilly committed. After an NGRI verdict and commitment, however, effective advocacy can help ensure a client receives appropriate care, individualized treatment, basic privileges, and—when supported by expert opinion—conditional or unconditional release. Under RCW 10.77, release decisions turn on whether the patient presents a substantial danger to the community.
By bringing these cases to light, litigators can challenge long-standing practices that prioritized confinement over treatment—and instead advocate for evidence-based care, common sense, and a more efficient use of valuable resources.
If someone you love is facing a potential NGRI finding, your firm is interested in training on NGRI commitments, or you are a criminal defense lawyer with questions about the NGRI process for a hypothetical client, please contact Chase Law PLLC to discuss what you need to know to pursue the best possible outcome.
Please note that contacting me does not create an attorney-client relationship, and there will not be a response unless you provide sufficient information to complete a conflict check.
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 206-841-0171
You may also use the inquiry form below